Friedmans
believes that government is coercive and every governmental intervention in the
free market breeds unintended results. Here are two examples:
Example
1 – jobs bills
The U.S.
government intends to create jobs by raising the gasoline tax to finance the
highway and bridge projects.
Who
benefits?
Workers
employed to rebuild the roads and bridges.
Who is
harmed unintentionally?
(1)
Workers employed to build the tanks.
(2)
Taxpayers. They are now with less to spend and employ few people in other
industries
Example
2 – protect American industry
The U.S. government intends to "save" the
jobs of U.S.
automobile workers by imposing "voluntary" quotas on Japanese car
exporters.
Who
benefits?
The
stockholders of the U.S.
companies manufacturing cars and their workers and suppliers.
Who is
harmed unintentionally?
(1) The
stockholders, employees, and suppliers of Japanese auto companies.
(2) The
U.S.
consumers. The buyers now have a smaller range of choice of cars and have to
pay a higher price for them.
(3) The
U.S.
farmers and lumbermen. Agricultural and timber products are U.S. ’s major export to Japan . If the Japanese earn fewer
dollars by selling cars, their demand for these products will fall.
Ironically,
the intended outcomes (usually the benefits) are visible, immediate, and
concentrated; the unintended outcomes (usually the harms) are invisible,
delayed and diffused. The workers who build the tanks, the farmers and
lumbermen never have the faintest idea that it is the government who was
responsible for their bad fortune (p.117). To the government, these beneficiaries
can exert the most political
influence.
His
position of minimizing the role of government in favor of the private sector
may not get rounds of applause these days. Yet, his views of monetary policy,
taxation, privatization and deregulation shed insights to the policy of
governments around the globe in 1980s. His ideas also played a major role in
the transformation of China 's
economy.

No comments:
Post a Comment